timers: simplify lockdep handling
In order to avoid the false positive from lockdep, each per-cpu base->lock has
the separate lock class and migrate_timers() uses double_spin_lock().
This all is overcomplicated: except for migrate_timers() we never take 2 locks
at once, and migrate_timers() can use spin_lock_nested().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index b024106..f3d35d4 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -1228,13 +1228,6 @@
return 0;
}
-/*
- * lockdep: we want to track each per-CPU base as a separate lock-class,
- * but timer-bases are kmalloc()-ed, so we need to attach separate
- * keys to them:
- */
-static struct lock_class_key base_lock_keys[NR_CPUS];
-
static int __cpuinit init_timers_cpu(int cpu)
{
int j;
@@ -1277,7 +1270,6 @@
}
spin_lock_init(&base->lock);
- lockdep_set_class(&base->lock, base_lock_keys + cpu);
for (j = 0; j < TVN_SIZE; j++) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv5.vec + j);
@@ -1316,8 +1308,8 @@
new_base = get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
local_irq_disable();
- double_spin_lock(&new_base->lock, &old_base->lock,
- smp_processor_id() < cpu);
+ spin_lock(&new_base->lock);
+ spin_lock_nested(&old_base->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
BUG_ON(old_base->running_timer);
@@ -1330,8 +1322,8 @@
migrate_timer_list(new_base, old_base->tv5.vec + i);
}
- double_spin_unlock(&new_base->lock, &old_base->lock,
- smp_processor_id() < cpu);
+ spin_unlock(&old_base->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&new_base->lock);
local_irq_enable();
put_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
}
