cpufreq: make table sentinel macros unsigned to match use
Commit 5eeaf1f18973 (cpufreq: Fix build error on some platforms that
use cpufreq_for_each_*) moved function cpufreq_next_valid() to a public
header. Warnings are now generated when objects including that header
are built with -Wsign-compare (as an out-of-tree module might be):
.../include/linux/cpufreq.h: In function ‘cpufreq_next_valid’:
.../include/linux/cpufreq.h:519:27: warning: comparison between signed
and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
while ((*pos)->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END)
^
.../include/linux/cpufreq.h:520:25: warning: comparison between signed
and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
if ((*pos)->frequency != CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)
^
Constants CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID and CPUFREQ_TABLE_END are signed, but
are used with unsigned member 'frequency' of cpufreq_frequency_table.
Update the macro definitions to be explicitly unsigned to match their
use.
This also corrects potentially wrong behavior of clk_rate_table_iter()
if unsigned long is wider than usigned int.
Fixes: 5eeaf1f18973 (cpufreq: Fix build error on some platforms that use cpufreq_for_each_*)
Signed-off-by: Brian W Hart <hartb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
1 file changed
