gem5 /
arm /
linux /
a9e220f8322e2b0e0b8903fe00265461cffad3f0 No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
We can't run into contention on it. All other callers of lock_super()
either hold s_umount (and we have it exclusive) or hold an active
reference to superblock in question, which prevents the call of
generic_shutdown_super() while the reference is held. So we can
replace lock_super(s) with get_fs_excl() in generic_shutdown_super()
(and corresponding change for unlock_super(), of course).
Since ext4 expects s_lock held for its put_super, take lock_super()
into it. The rest of filesystems do not care at all.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2 files changed
