[PATCH] x86: do_IRQ(): check irq number
We recently changed x86 to handle more than 256 IRQs. Add a check in do_IRQ()
just to make sure that nothing went wrong with that implementation.
[chrisw@sous-sol.org: do x86_64 too]
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: "Protasevich, Natalie" <Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com>
Cc: <Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c b/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
index c703bc7..9eec943 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
@@ -60,6 +60,12 @@
u32 *isp;
#endif
+ if (unlikely((unsigned)irq >= NR_IRQS)) {
+ printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: cannot handle IRQ %d\n",
+ __FUNCTION__, irq);
+ BUG();
+ }
+
irq_enter();
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
/* Debugging check for stack overflow: is there less than 1KB free? */
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c
index 3be0a7e..bfa82f5 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c
@@ -118,6 +118,12 @@
/* high bit used in ret_from_ code */
unsigned irq = ~regs->orig_rax;
+ if (unlikely(irq >= NR_IRQS)) {
+ printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: cannot handle IRQ %d\n",
+ __FUNCTION__, irq);
+ BUG();
+ }
+
exit_idle();
irq_enter();
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
