)]}'
{
  "commit": "dcec0b60a8213aeb876823a15d834009fce3b36e",
  "tree": "a6096b9f0479415a9070878ebb780fe44f39c3da",
  "parents": [
    "5bccd16657e893e52e96547e7c2b5729d78d4e45"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Michal Hocko",
    "email": "mhocko@suse.com",
    "time": "Wed Feb 22 15:44:33 2017 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Linus Torvalds",
    "email": "torvalds@linux-foundation.org",
    "time": "Wed Feb 22 16:41:29 2017 -0800"
  },
  "message": "mm, vmscan: add mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low tracepoint\n\nCurrently we have tracepoints for both active and inactive LRU lists\nreclaim but we do not have any which would tell us why we we decided to\nage the active list.  Without that it is quite hard to diagnose\nactive/inactive lists balancing.  Add mm_vmscan_inactive_list_is_low\ntracepoint to tell us this information.\n\nLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170104101942.4860-8-mhocko@kernel.org\nSigned-off-by: Michal Hocko \u003cmhocko@suse.com\u003e\nAcked-by: Hillf Danton \u003chillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com\u003e\nAcked-by: Mel Gorman \u003cmgorman@suse.de\u003e\nAcked-by: Vlastimil Babka \u003cvbabka@suse.cz\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@linux-foundation.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@linux-foundation.org\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "08c1cd5af0d6beba0b4586172a25c089a35cf0c3",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "include/trace/events/vmscan.h",
      "new_id": "27e8a5c775797d4f6bdbc142f44c491e9c8436dd",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "include/trace/events/vmscan.h"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "8cc90bd8149d19da4e190f2038a8c260822a5c3a",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "mm/vmscan.c",
      "new_id": "de400d1eac0e8d6ef3b67cd5a370140ef9e1fa9f",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "mm/vmscan.c"
    }
  ]
}