[PATCH] x86_64: coding style and whitespace fixups
Remove some of the unnecessary differences between arch/i386 and
arch/x86_64. This patch fixes more whitespace issues, some miscellaneous
typos, a wrong URL and a factually incorrect statement about the current
boot sector code.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/arch/i386/boot/setup.S b/arch/i386/boot/setup.S
index caa1fde..8cb420f 100644
--- a/arch/i386/boot/setup.S
+++ b/arch/i386/boot/setup.S
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
* Transcribed from Intel (as86) -> AT&T (gas) by Chris Noe, May 1999.
* <stiker@northlink.com>
*
- * Fix to work around buggy BIOSes which dont use carry bit correctly
+ * Fix to work around buggy BIOSes which don't use carry bit correctly
* and/or report extended memory in CX/DX for e801h memory size detection
* call. As a result the kernel got wrong figures. The int15/e801h docs
* from Ralf Brown interrupt list seem to indicate AX/BX should be used
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@
meme801:
stc # fix to work around buggy
- xorw %cx,%cx # BIOSes which dont clear/set
+ xorw %cx,%cx # BIOSes which don't clear/set
xorw %dx,%dx # carry on pass/error of
# e801h memory size call
# or merely pass cx,dx though
@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@
#
# but we yet haven't reloaded the CS register, so the default size
# of the target offset still is 16 bit.
-# However, using an operand prefix (0x66), the CPU will properly
+# However, using an operand prefix (0x66), the CPU will properly
# take our 48 bit far pointer. (INTeL 80386 Programmer's Reference
# Manual, Mixing 16-bit and 32-bit code, page 16-6)
