| CPUSETS | |
| ------- | |
| Copyright (C) 2004 BULL SA. | |
| Written by Simon.Derr@bull.net | |
| Portions Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Silicon Graphics, Inc. | |
| Modified by Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> | |
| Modified by Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> | |
| Modified by Paul Menage <menage@google.com> | |
| Modified by Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> | |
| CONTENTS: | |
| ========= | |
| 1. Cpusets | |
| 1.1 What are cpusets ? | |
| 1.2 Why are cpusets needed ? | |
| 1.3 How are cpusets implemented ? | |
| 1.4 What are exclusive cpusets ? | |
| 1.5 What is memory_pressure ? | |
| 1.6 What is memory spread ? | |
| 1.7 What is sched_load_balance ? | |
| 1.8 What is sched_relax_domain_level ? | |
| 1.9 How do I use cpusets ? | |
| 2. Usage Examples and Syntax | |
| 2.1 Basic Usage | |
| 2.2 Adding/removing cpus | |
| 2.3 Setting flags | |
| 2.4 Attaching processes | |
| 3. Questions | |
| 4. Contact | |
| 1. Cpusets | |
| ========== | |
| 1.1 What are cpusets ? | |
| ---------------------- | |
| Cpusets provide a mechanism for assigning a set of CPUs and Memory | |
| Nodes to a set of tasks. In this document "Memory Node" refers to | |
| an on-line node that contains memory. | |
| Cpusets constrain the CPU and Memory placement of tasks to only | |
| the resources within a task's current cpuset. They form a nested | |
| hierarchy visible in a virtual file system. These are the essential | |
| hooks, beyond what is already present, required to manage dynamic | |
| job placement on large systems. | |
| Cpusets use the generic cgroup subsystem described in | |
| Documentation/cgroups/cgroups.txt. | |
| Requests by a task, using the sched_setaffinity(2) system call to | |
| include CPUs in its CPU affinity mask, and using the mbind(2) and | |
| set_mempolicy(2) system calls to include Memory Nodes in its memory | |
| policy, are both filtered through that task's cpuset, filtering out any | |
| CPUs or Memory Nodes not in that cpuset. The scheduler will not | |
| schedule a task on a CPU that is not allowed in its cpus_allowed | |
| vector, and the kernel page allocator will not allocate a page on a | |
| node that is not allowed in the requesting task's mems_allowed vector. | |
| User level code may create and destroy cpusets by name in the cgroup | |
| virtual file system, manage the attributes and permissions of these | |
| cpusets and which CPUs and Memory Nodes are assigned to each cpuset, | |
| specify and query to which cpuset a task is assigned, and list the | |
| task pids assigned to a cpuset. | |
| 1.2 Why are cpusets needed ? | |
| ---------------------------- | |
| The management of large computer systems, with many processors (CPUs), | |
| complex memory cache hierarchies and multiple Memory Nodes having | |
| non-uniform access times (NUMA) presents additional challenges for | |
| the efficient scheduling and memory placement of processes. | |
| Frequently more modest sized systems can be operated with adequate | |
| efficiency just by letting the operating system automatically share | |
| the available CPU and Memory resources amongst the requesting tasks. | |
| But larger systems, which benefit more from careful processor and | |
| memory placement to reduce memory access times and contention, | |
| and which typically represent a larger investment for the customer, | |
| can benefit from explicitly placing jobs on properly sized subsets of | |
| the system. | |
| This can be especially valuable on: | |
| * Web Servers running multiple instances of the same web application, | |
| * Servers running different applications (for instance, a web server | |
| and a database), or | |
| * NUMA systems running large HPC applications with demanding | |
| performance characteristics. | |
| These subsets, or "soft partitions" must be able to be dynamically | |
| adjusted, as the job mix changes, without impacting other concurrently | |
| executing jobs. The location of the running jobs pages may also be moved | |
| when the memory locations are changed. | |
| The kernel cpuset patch provides the minimum essential kernel | |
| mechanisms required to efficiently implement such subsets. It | |
| leverages existing CPU and Memory Placement facilities in the Linux | |
| kernel to avoid any additional impact on the critical scheduler or | |
| memory allocator code. | |
| 1.3 How are cpusets implemented ? | |
| --------------------------------- | |
| Cpusets provide a Linux kernel mechanism to constrain which CPUs and | |
| Memory Nodes are used by a process or set of processes. | |
| The Linux kernel already has a pair of mechanisms to specify on which | |
| CPUs a task may be scheduled (sched_setaffinity) and on which Memory | |
| Nodes it may obtain memory (mbind, set_mempolicy). | |
| Cpusets extends these two mechanisms as follows: | |
| - Cpusets are sets of allowed CPUs and Memory Nodes, known to the | |
| kernel. | |
| - Each task in the system is attached to a cpuset, via a pointer | |
| in the task structure to a reference counted cgroup structure. | |
| - Calls to sched_setaffinity are filtered to just those CPUs | |
| allowed in that task's cpuset. | |
| - Calls to mbind and set_mempolicy are filtered to just | |
| those Memory Nodes allowed in that task's cpuset. | |
| - The root cpuset contains all the systems CPUs and Memory | |
| Nodes. | |
| - For any cpuset, one can define child cpusets containing a subset | |
| of the parents CPU and Memory Node resources. | |
| - The hierarchy of cpusets can be mounted at /dev/cpuset, for | |
| browsing and manipulation from user space. | |
| - A cpuset may be marked exclusive, which ensures that no other | |
| cpuset (except direct ancestors and descendants) may contain | |
| any overlapping CPUs or Memory Nodes. | |
| - You can list all the tasks (by pid) attached to any cpuset. | |
| The implementation of cpusets requires a few, simple hooks | |
| into the rest of the kernel, none in performance critical paths: | |
| - in init/main.c, to initialize the root cpuset at system boot. | |
| - in fork and exit, to attach and detach a task from its cpuset. | |
| - in sched_setaffinity, to mask the requested CPUs by what's | |
| allowed in that task's cpuset. | |
| - in sched.c migrate_live_tasks(), to keep migrating tasks within | |
| the CPUs allowed by their cpuset, if possible. | |
| - in the mbind and set_mempolicy system calls, to mask the requested | |
| Memory Nodes by what's allowed in that task's cpuset. | |
| - in page_alloc.c, to restrict memory to allowed nodes. | |
| - in vmscan.c, to restrict page recovery to the current cpuset. | |
| You should mount the "cgroup" filesystem type in order to enable | |
| browsing and modifying the cpusets presently known to the kernel. No | |
| new system calls are added for cpusets - all support for querying and | |
| modifying cpusets is via this cpuset file system. | |
| The /proc/<pid>/status file for each task has four added lines, | |
| displaying the task's cpus_allowed (on which CPUs it may be scheduled) | |
| and mems_allowed (on which Memory Nodes it may obtain memory), | |
| in the two formats seen in the following example: | |
| Cpus_allowed: ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff | |
| Cpus_allowed_list: 0-127 | |
| Mems_allowed: ffffffff,ffffffff | |
| Mems_allowed_list: 0-63 | |
| Each cpuset is represented by a directory in the cgroup file system | |
| containing (on top of the standard cgroup files) the following | |
| files describing that cpuset: | |
| - cpuset.cpus: list of CPUs in that cpuset | |
| - cpuset.mems: list of Memory Nodes in that cpuset | |
| - cpuset.memory_migrate flag: if set, move pages to cpusets nodes | |
| - cpuset.cpu_exclusive flag: is cpu placement exclusive? | |
| - cpuset.mem_exclusive flag: is memory placement exclusive? | |
| - cpuset.mem_hardwall flag: is memory allocation hardwalled | |
| - cpuset.memory_pressure: measure of how much paging pressure in cpuset | |
| - cpuset.memory_spread_page flag: if set, spread page cache evenly on allowed nodes | |
| - cpuset.memory_spread_slab flag: if set, spread slab cache evenly on allowed nodes | |
| - cpuset.sched_load_balance flag: if set, load balance within CPUs on that cpuset | |
| - cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level: the searching range when migrating tasks | |
| In addition, only the root cpuset has the following file: | |
| - cpuset.memory_pressure_enabled flag: compute memory_pressure? | |
| New cpusets are created using the mkdir system call or shell | |
| command. The properties of a cpuset, such as its flags, allowed | |
| CPUs and Memory Nodes, and attached tasks, are modified by writing | |
| to the appropriate file in that cpusets directory, as listed above. | |
| The named hierarchical structure of nested cpusets allows partitioning | |
| a large system into nested, dynamically changeable, "soft-partitions". | |
| The attachment of each task, automatically inherited at fork by any | |
| children of that task, to a cpuset allows organizing the work load | |
| on a system into related sets of tasks such that each set is constrained | |
| to using the CPUs and Memory Nodes of a particular cpuset. A task | |
| may be re-attached to any other cpuset, if allowed by the permissions | |
| on the necessary cpuset file system directories. | |
| Such management of a system "in the large" integrates smoothly with | |
| the detailed placement done on individual tasks and memory regions | |
| using the sched_setaffinity, mbind and set_mempolicy system calls. | |
| The following rules apply to each cpuset: | |
| - Its CPUs and Memory Nodes must be a subset of its parents. | |
| - It can't be marked exclusive unless its parent is. | |
| - If its cpu or memory is exclusive, they may not overlap any sibling. | |
| These rules, and the natural hierarchy of cpusets, enable efficient | |
| enforcement of the exclusive guarantee, without having to scan all | |
| cpusets every time any of them change to ensure nothing overlaps a | |
| exclusive cpuset. Also, the use of a Linux virtual file system (vfs) | |
| to represent the cpuset hierarchy provides for a familiar permission | |
| and name space for cpusets, with a minimum of additional kernel code. | |
| The cpus and mems files in the root (top_cpuset) cpuset are | |
| read-only. The cpus file automatically tracks the value of | |
| cpu_online_mask using a CPU hotplug notifier, and the mems file | |
| automatically tracks the value of node_states[N_MEMORY]--i.e., | |
| nodes with memory--using the cpuset_track_online_nodes() hook. | |
| 1.4 What are exclusive cpusets ? | |
| -------------------------------- | |
| If a cpuset is cpu or mem exclusive, no other cpuset, other than | |
| a direct ancestor or descendant, may share any of the same CPUs or | |
| Memory Nodes. | |
| A cpuset that is cpuset.mem_exclusive *or* cpuset.mem_hardwall is "hardwalled", | |
| i.e. it restricts kernel allocations for page, buffer and other data | |
| commonly shared by the kernel across multiple users. All cpusets, | |
| whether hardwalled or not, restrict allocations of memory for user | |
| space. This enables configuring a system so that several independent | |
| jobs can share common kernel data, such as file system pages, while | |
| isolating each job's user allocation in its own cpuset. To do this, | |
| construct a large mem_exclusive cpuset to hold all the jobs, and | |
| construct child, non-mem_exclusive cpusets for each individual job. | |
| Only a small amount of typical kernel memory, such as requests from | |
| interrupt handlers, is allowed to be taken outside even a | |
| mem_exclusive cpuset. | |
| 1.5 What is memory_pressure ? | |
| ----------------------------- | |
| The memory_pressure of a cpuset provides a simple per-cpuset metric | |
| of the rate that the tasks in a cpuset are attempting to free up in | |
| use memory on the nodes of the cpuset to satisfy additional memory | |
| requests. | |
| This enables batch managers monitoring jobs running in dedicated | |
| cpusets to efficiently detect what level of memory pressure that job | |
| is causing. | |
| This is useful both on tightly managed systems running a wide mix of | |
| submitted jobs, which may choose to terminate or re-prioritize jobs that | |
| are trying to use more memory than allowed on the nodes assigned to them, | |
| and with tightly coupled, long running, massively parallel scientific | |
| computing jobs that will dramatically fail to meet required performance | |
| goals if they start to use more memory than allowed to them. | |
| This mechanism provides a very economical way for the batch manager | |
| to monitor a cpuset for signs of memory pressure. It's up to the | |
| batch manager or other user code to decide what to do about it and | |
| take action. | |
| ==> Unless this feature is enabled by writing "1" to the special file | |
| /dev/cpuset/memory_pressure_enabled, the hook in the rebalance | |
| code of __alloc_pages() for this metric reduces to simply noticing | |
| that the cpuset_memory_pressure_enabled flag is zero. So only | |
| systems that enable this feature will compute the metric. | |
| Why a per-cpuset, running average: | |
| Because this meter is per-cpuset, rather than per-task or mm, | |
| the system load imposed by a batch scheduler monitoring this | |
| metric is sharply reduced on large systems, because a scan of | |
| the tasklist can be avoided on each set of queries. | |
| Because this meter is a running average, instead of an accumulating | |
| counter, a batch scheduler can detect memory pressure with a | |
| single read, instead of having to read and accumulate results | |
| for a period of time. | |
| Because this meter is per-cpuset rather than per-task or mm, | |
| the batch scheduler can obtain the key information, memory | |
| pressure in a cpuset, with a single read, rather than having to | |
| query and accumulate results over all the (dynamically changing) | |
| set of tasks in the cpuset. | |
| A per-cpuset simple digital filter (requires a spinlock and 3 words | |
| of data per-cpuset) is kept, and updated by any task attached to that | |
| cpuset, if it enters the synchronous (direct) page reclaim code. | |
| A per-cpuset file provides an integer number representing the recent | |
| (half-life of 10 seconds) rate of direct page reclaims caused by | |
| the tasks in the cpuset, in units of reclaims attempted per second, | |
| times 1000. | |
| 1.6 What is memory spread ? | |
| --------------------------- | |
| There are two boolean flag files per cpuset that control where the | |
| kernel allocates pages for the file system buffers and related in | |
| kernel data structures. They are called 'cpuset.memory_spread_page' and | |
| 'cpuset.memory_spread_slab'. | |
| If the per-cpuset boolean flag file 'cpuset.memory_spread_page' is set, then | |
| the kernel will spread the file system buffers (page cache) evenly | |
| over all the nodes that the faulting task is allowed to use, instead | |
| of preferring to put those pages on the node where the task is running. | |
| If the per-cpuset boolean flag file 'cpuset.memory_spread_slab' is set, | |
| then the kernel will spread some file system related slab caches, | |
| such as for inodes and dentries evenly over all the nodes that the | |
| faulting task is allowed to use, instead of preferring to put those | |
| pages on the node where the task is running. | |
| The setting of these flags does not affect anonymous data segment or | |
| stack segment pages of a task. | |
| By default, both kinds of memory spreading are off, and memory | |
| pages are allocated on the node local to where the task is running, | |
| except perhaps as modified by the task's NUMA mempolicy or cpuset | |
| configuration, so long as sufficient free memory pages are available. | |
| When new cpusets are created, they inherit the memory spread settings | |
| of their parent. | |
| Setting memory spreading causes allocations for the affected page | |
| or slab caches to ignore the task's NUMA mempolicy and be spread | |
| instead. Tasks using mbind() or set_mempolicy() calls to set NUMA | |
| mempolicies will not notice any change in these calls as a result of | |
| their containing task's memory spread settings. If memory spreading | |
| is turned off, then the currently specified NUMA mempolicy once again | |
| applies to memory page allocations. | |
| Both 'cpuset.memory_spread_page' and 'cpuset.memory_spread_slab' are boolean flag | |
| files. By default they contain "0", meaning that the feature is off | |
| for that cpuset. If a "1" is written to that file, then that turns | |
| the named feature on. | |
| The implementation is simple. | |
| Setting the flag 'cpuset.memory_spread_page' turns on a per-process flag | |
| PF_SPREAD_PAGE for each task that is in that cpuset or subsequently | |
| joins that cpuset. The page allocation calls for the page cache | |
| is modified to perform an inline check for this PF_SPREAD_PAGE task | |
| flag, and if set, a call to a new routine cpuset_mem_spread_node() | |
| returns the node to prefer for the allocation. | |
| Similarly, setting 'cpuset.memory_spread_slab' turns on the flag | |
| PF_SPREAD_SLAB, and appropriately marked slab caches will allocate | |
| pages from the node returned by cpuset_mem_spread_node(). | |
| The cpuset_mem_spread_node() routine is also simple. It uses the | |
| value of a per-task rotor cpuset_mem_spread_rotor to select the next | |
| node in the current task's mems_allowed to prefer for the allocation. | |
| This memory placement policy is also known (in other contexts) as | |
| round-robin or interleave. | |
| This policy can provide substantial improvements for jobs that need | |
| to place thread local data on the corresponding node, but that need | |
| to access large file system data sets that need to be spread across | |
| the several nodes in the jobs cpuset in order to fit. Without this | |
| policy, especially for jobs that might have one thread reading in the | |
| data set, the memory allocation across the nodes in the jobs cpuset | |
| can become very uneven. | |
| 1.7 What is sched_load_balance ? | |
| -------------------------------- | |
| The kernel scheduler (kernel/sched/core.c) automatically load balances | |
| tasks. If one CPU is underutilized, kernel code running on that | |
| CPU will look for tasks on other more overloaded CPUs and move those | |
| tasks to itself, within the constraints of such placement mechanisms | |
| as cpusets and sched_setaffinity. | |
| The algorithmic cost of load balancing and its impact on key shared | |
| kernel data structures such as the task list increases more than | |
| linearly with the number of CPUs being balanced. So the scheduler | |
| has support to partition the systems CPUs into a number of sched | |
| domains such that it only load balances within each sched domain. | |
| Each sched domain covers some subset of the CPUs in the system; | |
| no two sched domains overlap; some CPUs might not be in any sched | |
| domain and hence won't be load balanced. | |
| Put simply, it costs less to balance between two smaller sched domains | |
| than one big one, but doing so means that overloads in one of the | |
| two domains won't be load balanced to the other one. | |
| By default, there is one sched domain covering all CPUs, except those | |
| marked isolated using the kernel boot time "isolcpus=" argument. | |
| This default load balancing across all CPUs is not well suited for | |
| the following two situations: | |
| 1) On large systems, load balancing across many CPUs is expensive. | |
| If the system is managed using cpusets to place independent jobs | |
| on separate sets of CPUs, full load balancing is unnecessary. | |
| 2) Systems supporting realtime on some CPUs need to minimize | |
| system overhead on those CPUs, including avoiding task load | |
| balancing if that is not needed. | |
| When the per-cpuset flag "cpuset.sched_load_balance" is enabled (the default | |
| setting), it requests that all the CPUs in that cpusets allowed 'cpuset.cpus' | |
| be contained in a single sched domain, ensuring that load balancing | |
| can move a task (not otherwised pinned, as by sched_setaffinity) | |
| from any CPU in that cpuset to any other. | |
| When the per-cpuset flag "cpuset.sched_load_balance" is disabled, then the | |
| scheduler will avoid load balancing across the CPUs in that cpuset, | |
| --except-- in so far as is necessary because some overlapping cpuset | |
| has "sched_load_balance" enabled. | |
| So, for example, if the top cpuset has the flag "cpuset.sched_load_balance" | |
| enabled, then the scheduler will have one sched domain covering all | |
| CPUs, and the setting of the "cpuset.sched_load_balance" flag in any other | |
| cpusets won't matter, as we're already fully load balancing. | |
| Therefore in the above two situations, the top cpuset flag | |
| "cpuset.sched_load_balance" should be disabled, and only some of the smaller, | |
| child cpusets have this flag enabled. | |
| When doing this, you don't usually want to leave any unpinned tasks in | |
| the top cpuset that might use non-trivial amounts of CPU, as such tasks | |
| may be artificially constrained to some subset of CPUs, depending on | |
| the particulars of this flag setting in descendant cpusets. Even if | |
| such a task could use spare CPU cycles in some other CPUs, the kernel | |
| scheduler might not consider the possibility of load balancing that | |
| task to that underused CPU. | |
| Of course, tasks pinned to a particular CPU can be left in a cpuset | |
| that disables "cpuset.sched_load_balance" as those tasks aren't going anywhere | |
| else anyway. | |
| There is an impedance mismatch here, between cpusets and sched domains. | |
| Cpusets are hierarchical and nest. Sched domains are flat; they don't | |
| overlap and each CPU is in at most one sched domain. | |
| It is necessary for sched domains to be flat because load balancing | |
| across partially overlapping sets of CPUs would risk unstable dynamics | |
| that would be beyond our understanding. So if each of two partially | |
| overlapping cpusets enables the flag 'cpuset.sched_load_balance', then we | |
| form a single sched domain that is a superset of both. We won't move | |
| a task to a CPU outside it cpuset, but the scheduler load balancing | |
| code might waste some compute cycles considering that possibility. | |
| This mismatch is why there is not a simple one-to-one relation | |
| between which cpusets have the flag "cpuset.sched_load_balance" enabled, | |
| and the sched domain configuration. If a cpuset enables the flag, it | |
| will get balancing across all its CPUs, but if it disables the flag, | |
| it will only be assured of no load balancing if no other overlapping | |
| cpuset enables the flag. | |
| If two cpusets have partially overlapping 'cpuset.cpus' allowed, and only | |
| one of them has this flag enabled, then the other may find its | |
| tasks only partially load balanced, just on the overlapping CPUs. | |
| This is just the general case of the top_cpuset example given a few | |
| paragraphs above. In the general case, as in the top cpuset case, | |
| don't leave tasks that might use non-trivial amounts of CPU in | |
| such partially load balanced cpusets, as they may be artificially | |
| constrained to some subset of the CPUs allowed to them, for lack of | |
| load balancing to the other CPUs. | |
| 1.7.1 sched_load_balance implementation details. | |
| ------------------------------------------------ | |
| The per-cpuset flag 'cpuset.sched_load_balance' defaults to enabled (contrary | |
| to most cpuset flags.) When enabled for a cpuset, the kernel will | |
| ensure that it can load balance across all the CPUs in that cpuset | |
| (makes sure that all the CPUs in the cpus_allowed of that cpuset are | |
| in the same sched domain.) | |
| If two overlapping cpusets both have 'cpuset.sched_load_balance' enabled, | |
| then they will be (must be) both in the same sched domain. | |
| If, as is the default, the top cpuset has 'cpuset.sched_load_balance' enabled, | |
| then by the above that means there is a single sched domain covering | |
| the whole system, regardless of any other cpuset settings. | |
| The kernel commits to user space that it will avoid load balancing | |
| where it can. It will pick as fine a granularity partition of sched | |
| domains as it can while still providing load balancing for any set | |
| of CPUs allowed to a cpuset having 'cpuset.sched_load_balance' enabled. | |
| The internal kernel cpuset to scheduler interface passes from the | |
| cpuset code to the scheduler code a partition of the load balanced | |
| CPUs in the system. This partition is a set of subsets (represented | |
| as an array of struct cpumask) of CPUs, pairwise disjoint, that cover | |
| all the CPUs that must be load balanced. | |
| The cpuset code builds a new such partition and passes it to the | |
| scheduler sched domain setup code, to have the sched domains rebuilt | |
| as necessary, whenever: | |
| - the 'cpuset.sched_load_balance' flag of a cpuset with non-empty CPUs changes, | |
| - or CPUs come or go from a cpuset with this flag enabled, | |
| - or 'cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level' value of a cpuset with non-empty CPUs | |
| and with this flag enabled changes, | |
| - or a cpuset with non-empty CPUs and with this flag enabled is removed, | |
| - or a cpu is offlined/onlined. | |
| This partition exactly defines what sched domains the scheduler should | |
| setup - one sched domain for each element (struct cpumask) in the | |
| partition. | |
| The scheduler remembers the currently active sched domain partitions. | |
| When the scheduler routine partition_sched_domains() is invoked from | |
| the cpuset code to update these sched domains, it compares the new | |
| partition requested with the current, and updates its sched domains, | |
| removing the old and adding the new, for each change. | |
| 1.8 What is sched_relax_domain_level ? | |
| -------------------------------------- | |
| In sched domain, the scheduler migrates tasks in 2 ways; periodic load | |
| balance on tick, and at time of some schedule events. | |
| When a task is woken up, scheduler try to move the task on idle CPU. | |
| For example, if a task A running on CPU X activates another task B | |
| on the same CPU X, and if CPU Y is X's sibling and performing idle, | |
| then scheduler migrate task B to CPU Y so that task B can start on | |
| CPU Y without waiting task A on CPU X. | |
| And if a CPU run out of tasks in its runqueue, the CPU try to pull | |
| extra tasks from other busy CPUs to help them before it is going to | |
| be idle. | |
| Of course it takes some searching cost to find movable tasks and/or | |
| idle CPUs, the scheduler might not search all CPUs in the domain | |
| every time. In fact, in some architectures, the searching ranges on | |
| events are limited in the same socket or node where the CPU locates, | |
| while the load balance on tick searches all. | |
| For example, assume CPU Z is relatively far from CPU X. Even if CPU Z | |
| is idle while CPU X and the siblings are busy, scheduler can't migrate | |
| woken task B from X to Z since it is out of its searching range. | |
| As the result, task B on CPU X need to wait task A or wait load balance | |
| on the next tick. For some applications in special situation, waiting | |
| 1 tick may be too long. | |
| The 'cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level' file allows you to request changing | |
| this searching range as you like. This file takes int value which | |
| indicates size of searching range in levels ideally as follows, | |
| otherwise initial value -1 that indicates the cpuset has no request. | |
| -1 : no request. use system default or follow request of others. | |
| 0 : no search. | |
| 1 : search siblings (hyperthreads in a core). | |
| 2 : search cores in a package. | |
| 3 : search cpus in a node [= system wide on non-NUMA system] | |
| ( 4 : search nodes in a chunk of node [on NUMA system] ) | |
| ( 5 : search system wide [on NUMA system] ) | |
| The system default is architecture dependent. The system default | |
| can be changed using the relax_domain_level= boot parameter. | |
| This file is per-cpuset and affect the sched domain where the cpuset | |
| belongs to. Therefore if the flag 'cpuset.sched_load_balance' of a cpuset | |
| is disabled, then 'cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level' have no effect since | |
| there is no sched domain belonging the cpuset. | |
| If multiple cpusets are overlapping and hence they form a single sched | |
| domain, the largest value among those is used. Be careful, if one | |
| requests 0 and others are -1 then 0 is used. | |
| Note that modifying this file will have both good and bad effects, | |
| and whether it is acceptable or not depends on your situation. | |
| Don't modify this file if you are not sure. | |
| If your situation is: | |
| - The migration costs between each cpu can be assumed considerably | |
| small(for you) due to your special application's behavior or | |
| special hardware support for CPU cache etc. | |
| - The searching cost doesn't have impact(for you) or you can make | |
| the searching cost enough small by managing cpuset to compact etc. | |
| - The latency is required even it sacrifices cache hit rate etc. | |
| then increasing 'sched_relax_domain_level' would benefit you. | |
| 1.9 How do I use cpusets ? | |
| -------------------------- | |
| In order to minimize the impact of cpusets on critical kernel | |
| code, such as the scheduler, and due to the fact that the kernel | |
| does not support one task updating the memory placement of another | |
| task directly, the impact on a task of changing its cpuset CPU | |
| or Memory Node placement, or of changing to which cpuset a task | |
| is attached, is subtle. | |
| If a cpuset has its Memory Nodes modified, then for each task attached | |
| to that cpuset, the next time that the kernel attempts to allocate | |
| a page of memory for that task, the kernel will notice the change | |
| in the task's cpuset, and update its per-task memory placement to | |
| remain within the new cpusets memory placement. If the task was using | |
| mempolicy MPOL_BIND, and the nodes to which it was bound overlap with | |
| its new cpuset, then the task will continue to use whatever subset | |
| of MPOL_BIND nodes are still allowed in the new cpuset. If the task | |
| was using MPOL_BIND and now none of its MPOL_BIND nodes are allowed | |
| in the new cpuset, then the task will be essentially treated as if it | |
| was MPOL_BIND bound to the new cpuset (even though its NUMA placement, | |
| as queried by get_mempolicy(), doesn't change). If a task is moved | |
| from one cpuset to another, then the kernel will adjust the task's | |
| memory placement, as above, the next time that the kernel attempts | |
| to allocate a page of memory for that task. | |
| If a cpuset has its 'cpuset.cpus' modified, then each task in that cpuset | |
| will have its allowed CPU placement changed immediately. Similarly, | |
| if a task's pid is written to another cpusets 'cpuset.tasks' file, then its | |
| allowed CPU placement is changed immediately. If such a task had been | |
| bound to some subset of its cpuset using the sched_setaffinity() call, | |
| the task will be allowed to run on any CPU allowed in its new cpuset, | |
| negating the effect of the prior sched_setaffinity() call. | |
| In summary, the memory placement of a task whose cpuset is changed is | |
| updated by the kernel, on the next allocation of a page for that task, | |
| and the processor placement is updated immediately. | |
| Normally, once a page is allocated (given a physical page | |
| of main memory) then that page stays on whatever node it | |
| was allocated, so long as it remains allocated, even if the | |
| cpusets memory placement policy 'cpuset.mems' subsequently changes. | |
| If the cpuset flag file 'cpuset.memory_migrate' is set true, then when | |
| tasks are attached to that cpuset, any pages that task had | |
| allocated to it on nodes in its previous cpuset are migrated | |
| to the task's new cpuset. The relative placement of the page within | |
| the cpuset is preserved during these migration operations if possible. | |
| For example if the page was on the second valid node of the prior cpuset | |
| then the page will be placed on the second valid node of the new cpuset. | |
| Also if 'cpuset.memory_migrate' is set true, then if that cpuset's | |
| 'cpuset.mems' file is modified, pages allocated to tasks in that | |
| cpuset, that were on nodes in the previous setting of 'cpuset.mems', | |
| will be moved to nodes in the new setting of 'mems.' | |
| Pages that were not in the task's prior cpuset, or in the cpuset's | |
| prior 'cpuset.mems' setting, will not be moved. | |
| There is an exception to the above. If hotplug functionality is used | |
| to remove all the CPUs that are currently assigned to a cpuset, | |
| then all the tasks in that cpuset will be moved to the nearest ancestor | |
| with non-empty cpus. But the moving of some (or all) tasks might fail if | |
| cpuset is bound with another cgroup subsystem which has some restrictions | |
| on task attaching. In this failing case, those tasks will stay | |
| in the original cpuset, and the kernel will automatically update | |
| their cpus_allowed to allow all online CPUs. When memory hotplug | |
| functionality for removing Memory Nodes is available, a similar exception | |
| is expected to apply there as well. In general, the kernel prefers to | |
| violate cpuset placement, over starving a task that has had all | |
| its allowed CPUs or Memory Nodes taken offline. | |
| There is a second exception to the above. GFP_ATOMIC requests are | |
| kernel internal allocations that must be satisfied, immediately. | |
| The kernel may drop some request, in rare cases even panic, if a | |
| GFP_ATOMIC alloc fails. If the request cannot be satisfied within | |
| the current task's cpuset, then we relax the cpuset, and look for | |
| memory anywhere we can find it. It's better to violate the cpuset | |
| than stress the kernel. | |
| To start a new job that is to be contained within a cpuset, the steps are: | |
| 1) mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| 2) mount -t cgroup -ocpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| 3) Create the new cpuset by doing mkdir's and write's (or echo's) in | |
| the /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset virtual file system. | |
| 4) Start a task that will be the "founding father" of the new job. | |
| 5) Attach that task to the new cpuset by writing its pid to the | |
| /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset tasks file for that cpuset. | |
| 6) fork, exec or clone the job tasks from this founding father task. | |
| For example, the following sequence of commands will setup a cpuset | |
| named "Charlie", containing just CPUs 2 and 3, and Memory Node 1, | |
| and then start a subshell 'sh' in that cpuset: | |
| mount -t cgroup -ocpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| mkdir Charlie | |
| cd Charlie | |
| /bin/echo 2-3 > cpuset.cpus | |
| /bin/echo 1 > cpuset.mems | |
| /bin/echo $$ > tasks | |
| sh | |
| # The subshell 'sh' is now running in cpuset Charlie | |
| # The next line should display '/Charlie' | |
| cat /proc/self/cpuset | |
| There are ways to query or modify cpusets: | |
| - via the cpuset file system directly, using the various cd, mkdir, echo, | |
| cat, rmdir commands from the shell, or their equivalent from C. | |
| - via the C library libcpuset. | |
| - via the C library libcgroup. | |
| (http://sourceforge.net/projects/libcg/) | |
| - via the python application cset. | |
| (http://code.google.com/p/cpuset/) | |
| The sched_setaffinity calls can also be done at the shell prompt using | |
| SGI's runon or Robert Love's taskset. The mbind and set_mempolicy | |
| calls can be done at the shell prompt using the numactl command | |
| (part of Andi Kleen's numa package). | |
| 2. Usage Examples and Syntax | |
| ============================ | |
| 2.1 Basic Usage | |
| --------------- | |
| Creating, modifying, using the cpusets can be done through the cpuset | |
| virtual filesystem. | |
| To mount it, type: | |
| # mount -t cgroup -o cpuset cpuset /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| Then under /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset you can find a tree that corresponds to the | |
| tree of the cpusets in the system. For instance, /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| is the cpuset that holds the whole system. | |
| If you want to create a new cpuset under /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset: | |
| # cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| # mkdir my_cpuset | |
| Now you want to do something with this cpuset. | |
| # cd my_cpuset | |
| In this directory you can find several files: | |
| # ls | |
| cgroup.clone_children cpuset.memory_pressure | |
| cgroup.event_control cpuset.memory_spread_page | |
| cgroup.procs cpuset.memory_spread_slab | |
| cpuset.cpu_exclusive cpuset.mems | |
| cpuset.cpus cpuset.sched_load_balance | |
| cpuset.mem_exclusive cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level | |
| cpuset.mem_hardwall notify_on_release | |
| cpuset.memory_migrate tasks | |
| Reading them will give you information about the state of this cpuset: | |
| the CPUs and Memory Nodes it can use, the processes that are using | |
| it, its properties. By writing to these files you can manipulate | |
| the cpuset. | |
| Set some flags: | |
| # /bin/echo 1 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive | |
| Add some cpus: | |
| # /bin/echo 0-7 > cpuset.cpus | |
| Add some mems: | |
| # /bin/echo 0-7 > cpuset.mems | |
| Now attach your shell to this cpuset: | |
| # /bin/echo $$ > tasks | |
| You can also create cpusets inside your cpuset by using mkdir in this | |
| directory. | |
| # mkdir my_sub_cs | |
| To remove a cpuset, just use rmdir: | |
| # rmdir my_sub_cs | |
| This will fail if the cpuset is in use (has cpusets inside, or has | |
| processes attached). | |
| Note that for legacy reasons, the "cpuset" filesystem exists as a | |
| wrapper around the cgroup filesystem. | |
| The command | |
| mount -t cpuset X /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| is equivalent to | |
| mount -t cgroup -ocpuset,noprefix X /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset | |
| echo "/sbin/cpuset_release_agent" > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/release_agent | |
| 2.2 Adding/removing cpus | |
| ------------------------ | |
| This is the syntax to use when writing in the cpus or mems files | |
| in cpuset directories: | |
| # /bin/echo 1-4 > cpuset.cpus -> set cpus list to cpus 1,2,3,4 | |
| # /bin/echo 1,2,3,4 > cpuset.cpus -> set cpus list to cpus 1,2,3,4 | |
| To add a CPU to a cpuset, write the new list of CPUs including the | |
| CPU to be added. To add 6 to the above cpuset: | |
| # /bin/echo 1-4,6 > cpuset.cpus -> set cpus list to cpus 1,2,3,4,6 | |
| Similarly to remove a CPU from a cpuset, write the new list of CPUs | |
| without the CPU to be removed. | |
| To remove all the CPUs: | |
| # /bin/echo "" > cpuset.cpus -> clear cpus list | |
| 2.3 Setting flags | |
| ----------------- | |
| The syntax is very simple: | |
| # /bin/echo 1 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive -> set flag 'cpuset.cpu_exclusive' | |
| # /bin/echo 0 > cpuset.cpu_exclusive -> unset flag 'cpuset.cpu_exclusive' | |
| 2.4 Attaching processes | |
| ----------------------- | |
| # /bin/echo PID > tasks | |
| Note that it is PID, not PIDs. You can only attach ONE task at a time. | |
| If you have several tasks to attach, you have to do it one after another: | |
| # /bin/echo PID1 > tasks | |
| # /bin/echo PID2 > tasks | |
| ... | |
| # /bin/echo PIDn > tasks | |
| 3. Questions | |
| ============ | |
| Q: what's up with this '/bin/echo' ? | |
| A: bash's builtin 'echo' command does not check calls to write() against | |
| errors. If you use it in the cpuset file system, you won't be | |
| able to tell whether a command succeeded or failed. | |
| Q: When I attach processes, only the first of the line gets really attached ! | |
| A: We can only return one error code per call to write(). So you should also | |
| put only ONE pid. | |
| 4. Contact | |
| ========== | |
| Web: http://www.bullopensource.org/cpuset |