| #include <asm/branch.h> | |
| #include <asm/cacheflush.h> | |
| #include <asm/fpu_emulator.h> | |
| #include <asm/inst.h> | |
| #include <asm/mipsregs.h> | |
| #include <asm/uaccess.h> | |
| #include "ieee754.h" | |
| /* | |
| * Emulate the arbritrary instruction ir at xcp->cp0_epc. Required when | |
| * we have to emulate the instruction in a COP1 branch delay slot. Do | |
| * not change cp0_epc due to the instruction | |
| * | |
| * According to the spec: | |
| * 1) it shouldn't be a branch :-) | |
| * 2) it can be a COP instruction :-( | |
| * 3) if we are tring to run a protected memory space we must take | |
| * special care on memory access instructions :-( | |
| */ | |
| /* | |
| * "Trampoline" return routine to catch exception following | |
| * execution of delay-slot instruction execution. | |
| */ | |
| struct emuframe { | |
| mips_instruction emul; | |
| mips_instruction badinst; | |
| mips_instruction cookie; | |
| unsigned long epc; | |
| }; | |
| int mips_dsemul(struct pt_regs *regs, mips_instruction ir, unsigned long cpc) | |
| { | |
| extern asmlinkage void handle_dsemulret(void); | |
| struct emuframe __user *fr; | |
| int err; | |
| if ((get_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc) && ((ir >> 16) == MM_NOP16)) || | |
| (ir == 0)) { | |
| /* NOP is easy */ | |
| regs->cp0_epc = cpc; | |
| clear_delay_slot(regs); | |
| return 0; | |
| } | |
| pr_debug("dsemul %lx %lx\n", regs->cp0_epc, cpc); | |
| /* | |
| * The strategy is to push the instruction onto the user stack | |
| * and put a trap after it which we can catch and jump to | |
| * the required address any alternative apart from full | |
| * instruction emulation!!. | |
| * | |
| * Algorithmics used a system call instruction, and | |
| * borrowed that vector. MIPS/Linux version is a bit | |
| * more heavyweight in the interests of portability and | |
| * multiprocessor support. For Linux we generate a | |
| * an unaligned access and force an address error exception. | |
| * | |
| * For embedded systems (stand-alone) we prefer to use a | |
| * non-existing CP1 instruction. This prevents us from emulating | |
| * branches, but gives us a cleaner interface to the exception | |
| * handler (single entry point). | |
| */ | |
| /* Ensure that the two instructions are in the same cache line */ | |
| fr = (struct emuframe __user *) | |
| ((regs->regs[29] - sizeof(struct emuframe)) & ~0x7); | |
| /* Verify that the stack pointer is not competely insane */ | |
| if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe)))) | |
| return SIGBUS; | |
| if (get_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc)) { | |
| err = __put_user(ir >> 16, (u16 __user *)(&fr->emul)); | |
| err |= __put_user(ir & 0xffff, (u16 __user *)((long)(&fr->emul) + 2)); | |
| err |= __put_user(BREAK_MATH >> 16, (u16 __user *)(&fr->badinst)); | |
| err |= __put_user(BREAK_MATH & 0xffff, (u16 __user *)((long)(&fr->badinst) + 2)); | |
| } else { | |
| err = __put_user(ir, &fr->emul); | |
| err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BREAK_MATH, &fr->badinst); | |
| } | |
| err |= __put_user((mips_instruction)BD_COOKIE, &fr->cookie); | |
| err |= __put_user(cpc, &fr->epc); | |
| if (unlikely(err)) { | |
| MIPS_FPU_EMU_INC_STATS(errors); | |
| return SIGBUS; | |
| } | |
| regs->cp0_epc = ((unsigned long) &fr->emul) | | |
| get_isa16_mode(regs->cp0_epc); | |
| flush_cache_sigtramp((unsigned long)&fr->badinst); | |
| return SIGILL; /* force out of emulation loop */ | |
| } | |
| int do_dsemulret(struct pt_regs *xcp) | |
| { | |
| struct emuframe __user *fr; | |
| unsigned long epc; | |
| u32 insn, cookie; | |
| int err = 0; | |
| u16 instr[2]; | |
| fr = (struct emuframe __user *) | |
| (msk_isa16_mode(xcp->cp0_epc) - sizeof(mips_instruction)); | |
| /* | |
| * If we can't even access the area, something is very wrong, but we'll | |
| * leave that to the default handling | |
| */ | |
| if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, fr, sizeof(struct emuframe))) | |
| return 0; | |
| /* | |
| * Do some sanity checking on the stackframe: | |
| * | |
| * - Is the instruction pointed to by the EPC an BREAK_MATH? | |
| * - Is the following memory word the BD_COOKIE? | |
| */ | |
| if (get_isa16_mode(xcp->cp0_epc)) { | |
| err = __get_user(instr[0], (u16 __user *)(&fr->badinst)); | |
| err |= __get_user(instr[1], (u16 __user *)((long)(&fr->badinst) + 2)); | |
| insn = (instr[0] << 16) | instr[1]; | |
| } else { | |
| err = __get_user(insn, &fr->badinst); | |
| } | |
| err |= __get_user(cookie, &fr->cookie); | |
| if (unlikely(err || (insn != BREAK_MATH) || (cookie != BD_COOKIE))) { | |
| MIPS_FPU_EMU_INC_STATS(errors); | |
| return 0; | |
| } | |
| /* | |
| * At this point, we are satisfied that it's a BD emulation trap. Yes, | |
| * a user might have deliberately put two malformed and useless | |
| * instructions in a row in his program, in which case he's in for a | |
| * nasty surprise - the next instruction will be treated as a | |
| * continuation address! Alas, this seems to be the only way that we | |
| * can handle signals, recursion, and longjmps() in the context of | |
| * emulating the branch delay instruction. | |
| */ | |
| pr_debug("dsemulret\n"); | |
| if (__get_user(epc, &fr->epc)) { /* Saved EPC */ | |
| /* This is not a good situation to be in */ | |
| force_sig(SIGBUS, current); | |
| return 0; | |
| } | |
| /* Set EPC to return to post-branch instruction */ | |
| xcp->cp0_epc = epc; | |
| return 1; | |
| } |