| Compile-time stack metadata validation | |
| ====================================== | |
| Overview | |
| -------- | |
| The kernel CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION option enables a host tool named | |
| objtool which runs at compile time. It has a "check" subcommand which | |
| analyzes every .o file and ensures the validity of its stack metadata. | |
| It enforces a set of rules on asm code and C inline assembly code so | |
| that stack traces can be reliable. | |
| Currently it only checks frame pointer usage, but there are plans to add | |
| CFI validation for C files and CFI generation for asm files. | |
| For each function, it recursively follows all possible code paths and | |
| validates the correct frame pointer state at each instruction. | |
| It also follows code paths involving special sections, like | |
| .altinstructions, __jump_table, and __ex_table, which can add | |
| alternative execution paths to a given instruction (or set of | |
| instructions). Similarly, it knows how to follow switch statements, for | |
| which gcc sometimes uses jump tables. | |
| Why do we need stack metadata validation? | |
| ----------------------------------------- | |
| Here are some of the benefits of validating stack metadata: | |
| a) More reliable stack traces for frame pointer enabled kernels | |
| Frame pointers are used for debugging purposes. They allow runtime | |
| code and debug tools to be able to walk the stack to determine the | |
| chain of function call sites that led to the currently executing | |
| code. | |
| For some architectures, frame pointers are enabled by | |
| CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER. For some other architectures they may be | |
| required by the ABI (sometimes referred to as "backchain pointers"). | |
| For C code, gcc automatically generates instructions for setting up | |
| frame pointers when the -fno-omit-frame-pointer option is used. | |
| But for asm code, the frame setup instructions have to be written by | |
| hand, which most people don't do. So the end result is that | |
| CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is honored for C code but not for most asm code. | |
| For stack traces based on frame pointers to be reliable, all | |
| functions which call other functions must first create a stack frame | |
| and update the frame pointer. If a first function doesn't properly | |
| create a stack frame before calling a second function, the *caller* | |
| of the first function will be skipped on the stack trace. | |
| For example, consider the following example backtrace with frame | |
| pointers enabled: | |
| [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 | |
| [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 | |
| [<ffffffff8127f568>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0 | |
| [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 | |
| [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 | |
| [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 | |
| [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 | |
| [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 | |
| It correctly shows that the caller of cmdline_proc_show() is | |
| seq_read(). | |
| If we remove the frame pointer logic from cmdline_proc_show() by | |
| replacing the frame pointer related instructions with nops, here's | |
| what it looks like instead: | |
| [<ffffffff81812584>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x63 | |
| [<ffffffff812d6dc2>] cmdline_proc_show+0x12/0x30 | |
| [<ffffffff812cce62>] proc_reg_read+0x42/0x70 | |
| [<ffffffff81256197>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x100 | |
| [<ffffffff81256b16>] vfs_read+0x86/0x130 | |
| [<ffffffff81257898>] SyS_read+0x58/0xd0 | |
| [<ffffffff8181c1f2>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76 | |
| Notice that cmdline_proc_show()'s caller, seq_read(), has been | |
| skipped. Instead the stack trace seems to show that | |
| cmdline_proc_show() was called by proc_reg_read(). | |
| The benefit of objtool here is that because it ensures that *all* | |
| functions honor CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, no functions will ever[*] be | |
| skipped on a stack trace. | |
| [*] unless an interrupt or exception has occurred at the very | |
| beginning of a function before the stack frame has been created, | |
| or at the very end of the function after the stack frame has been | |
| destroyed. This is an inherent limitation of frame pointers. | |
| b) 100% reliable stack traces for DWARF enabled kernels | |
| (NOTE: This is not yet implemented) | |
| As an alternative to frame pointers, DWARF Call Frame Information | |
| (CFI) metadata can be used to walk the stack. Unlike frame pointers, | |
| CFI metadata is out of band. So it doesn't affect runtime | |
| performance and it can be reliable even when interrupts or exceptions | |
| are involved. | |
| For C code, gcc automatically generates DWARF CFI metadata. But for | |
| asm code, generating CFI is a tedious manual approach which requires | |
| manually placed .cfi assembler macros to be scattered throughout the | |
| code. It's clumsy and very easy to get wrong, and it makes the real | |
| code harder to read. | |
| Stacktool will improve this situation in several ways. For code | |
| which already has CFI annotations, it will validate them. For code | |
| which doesn't have CFI annotations, it will generate them. So an | |
| architecture can opt to strip out all the manual .cfi annotations | |
| from their asm code and have objtool generate them instead. | |
| We might also add a runtime stack validation debug option where we | |
| periodically walk the stack from schedule() and/or an NMI to ensure | |
| that the stack metadata is sane and that we reach the bottom of the | |
| stack. | |
| So the benefit of objtool here will be that external tooling should | |
| always show perfect stack traces. And the same will be true for | |
| kernel warning/oops traces if the architecture has a runtime DWARF | |
| unwinder. | |
| c) Higher live patching compatibility rate | |
| (NOTE: This is not yet implemented) | |
| Currently with CONFIG_LIVEPATCH there's a basic live patching | |
| framework which is safe for roughly 85-90% of "security" fixes. But | |
| patches can't have complex features like function dependency or | |
| prototype changes, or data structure changes. | |
| There's a strong need to support patches which have the more complex | |
| features so that the patch compatibility rate for security fixes can | |
| eventually approach something resembling 100%. To achieve that, a | |
| "consistency model" is needed, which allows tasks to be safely | |
| transitioned from an unpatched state to a patched state. | |
| One of the key requirements of the currently proposed livepatch | |
| consistency model [*] is that it needs to walk the stack of each | |
| sleeping task to determine if it can be transitioned to the patched | |
| state. If objtool can ensure that stack traces are reliable, this | |
| consistency model can be used and the live patching compatibility | |
| rate can be improved significantly. | |
| [*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1423499826.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com | |
| Rules | |
| ----- | |
| To achieve the validation, objtool enforces the following rules: | |
| 1. Each callable function must be annotated as such with the ELF | |
| function type. In asm code, this is typically done using the | |
| ENTRY/ENDPROC macros. If objtool finds a return instruction | |
| outside of a function, it flags an error since that usually indicates | |
| callable code which should be annotated accordingly. | |
| This rule is needed so that objtool can properly identify each | |
| callable function in order to analyze its stack metadata. | |
| 2. Conversely, each section of code which is *not* callable should *not* | |
| be annotated as an ELF function. The ENDPROC macro shouldn't be used | |
| in this case. | |
| This rule is needed so that objtool can ignore non-callable code. | |
| Such code doesn't have to follow any of the other rules. | |
| 3. Each callable function which calls another function must have the | |
| correct frame pointer logic, if required by CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER or | |
| the architecture's back chain rules. This can by done in asm code | |
| with the FRAME_BEGIN/FRAME_END macros. | |
| This rule ensures that frame pointer based stack traces will work as | |
| designed. If function A doesn't create a stack frame before calling | |
| function B, the _caller_ of function A will be skipped on the stack | |
| trace. | |
| 4. Dynamic jumps and jumps to undefined symbols are only allowed if: | |
| a) the jump is part of a switch statement; or | |
| b) the jump matches sibling call semantics and the frame pointer has | |
| the same value it had on function entry. | |
| This rule is needed so that objtool can reliably analyze all of a | |
| function's code paths. If a function jumps to code in another file, | |
| and it's not a sibling call, objtool has no way to follow the jump | |
| because it only analyzes a single file at a time. | |
| 5. A callable function may not execute kernel entry/exit instructions. | |
| The only code which needs such instructions is kernel entry code, | |
| which shouldn't be be in callable functions anyway. | |
| This rule is just a sanity check to ensure that callable functions | |
| return normally. | |
| Errors in .S files | |
| ------------------ | |
| If you're getting an error in a compiled .S file which you don't | |
| understand, first make sure that the affected code follows the above | |
| rules. | |
| Here are some examples of common warnings reported by objtool, what | |
| they mean, and suggestions for how to fix them. | |
| 1. asm_file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x128: call without frame pointer save/setup | |
| The func() function made a function call without first saving and/or | |
| updating the frame pointer. | |
| If func() is indeed a callable function, add proper frame pointer | |
| logic using the FRAME_BEGIN and FRAME_END macros. Otherwise, remove | |
| its ELF function annotation by changing ENDPROC to END. | |
| If you're getting this error in a .c file, see the "Errors in .c | |
| files" section. | |
| 2. asm_file.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x53: return instruction outside of a callable function | |
| A return instruction was detected, but objtool couldn't find a way | |
| for a callable function to reach the instruction. | |
| If the return instruction is inside (or reachable from) a callable | |
| function, the function needs to be annotated with the ENTRY/ENDPROC | |
| macros. | |
| If you _really_ need a return instruction outside of a function, and | |
| are 100% sure that it won't affect stack traces, you can tell | |
| objtool to ignore it. See the "Adding exceptions" section below. | |
| 3. asm_file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x9: function has unreachable instruction | |
| The instruction lives inside of a callable function, but there's no | |
| possible control flow path from the beginning of the function to the | |
| instruction. | |
| If the instruction is actually needed, and it's actually in a | |
| callable function, ensure that its function is properly annotated | |
| with ENTRY/ENDPROC. | |
| If it's not actually in a callable function (e.g. kernel entry code), | |
| change ENDPROC to END. | |
| 4. asm_file.o: warning: objtool: func(): can't find starting instruction | |
| or | |
| asm_file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x11dd: can't decode instruction | |
| Did you put data in a text section? If so, that can confuse | |
| objtool's instruction decoder. Move the data to a more appropriate | |
| section like .data or .rodata. | |
| 5. asm_file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x6: kernel entry/exit from callable instruction | |
| This is a kernel entry/exit instruction like sysenter or sysret. | |
| Such instructions aren't allowed in a callable function, and are most | |
| likely part of the kernel entry code. | |
| If the instruction isn't actually in a callable function, change | |
| ENDPROC to END. | |
| 6. asm_file.o: warning: objtool: func()+0x26: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer | |
| This is a dynamic jump or a jump to an undefined symbol. Stacktool | |
| assumed it's a sibling call and detected that the frame pointer | |
| wasn't first restored to its original state. | |
| If it's not really a sibling call, you may need to move the | |
| destination code to the local file. | |
| If the instruction is not actually in a callable function (e.g. | |
| kernel entry code), change ENDPROC to END. | |
| 7. asm_file: warning: objtool: func()+0x5c: frame pointer state mismatch | |
| The instruction's frame pointer state is inconsistent, depending on | |
| which execution path was taken to reach the instruction. | |
| Make sure the function pushes and sets up the frame pointer (for | |
| x86_64, this means rbp) at the beginning of the function and pops it | |
| at the end of the function. Also make sure that no other code in the | |
| function touches the frame pointer. | |
| Errors in .c files | |
| ------------------ | |
| 1. c_file.o: warning: objtool: funcA() falls through to next function funcB() | |
| This means that funcA() doesn't end with a return instruction or an | |
| unconditional jump, and that objtool has determined that the function | |
| can fall through into the next function. There could be different | |
| reasons for this: | |
| 1) funcA()'s last instruction is a call to a "noreturn" function like | |
| panic(). In this case the noreturn function needs to be added to | |
| objtool's hard-coded global_noreturns array. Feel free to bug the | |
| objtool maintainer, or you can submit a patch. | |
| 2) funcA() uses the unreachable() annotation in a section of code | |
| that is actually reachable. | |
| 3) If funcA() calls an inline function, the object code for funcA() | |
| might be corrupt due to a gcc bug. For more details, see: | |
| https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 | |
| 2. If you're getting any other objtool error in a compiled .c file, it | |
| may be because the file uses an asm() statement which has a "call" | |
| instruction. An asm() statement with a call instruction must declare | |
| the use of the stack pointer in its output operand. For example, on | |
| x86_64: | |
| register void *__sp asm("rsp"); | |
| asm volatile("call func" : "+r" (__sp)); | |
| Otherwise the stack frame may not get created before the call. | |
| 3. Another possible cause for errors in C code is if the Makefile removes | |
| -fno-omit-frame-pointer or adds -fomit-frame-pointer to the gcc options. | |
| Also see the above section for .S file errors for more information what | |
| the individual error messages mean. | |
| If the error doesn't seem to make sense, it could be a bug in objtool. | |
| Feel free to ask the objtool maintainer for help. | |
| Adding exceptions | |
| ----------------- | |
| If you _really_ need objtool to ignore something, and are 100% sure | |
| that it won't affect kernel stack traces, you can tell objtool to | |
| ignore it: | |
| - To skip validation of a function, use the STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD | |
| macro. | |
| - To skip validation of a file, add | |
| OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_filename.o := n | |
| to the Makefile. | |
| - To skip validation of a directory, add | |
| OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD := y | |
| to the Makefile. |