| Control Group v2 | |
| October, 2015 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | |
| This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and | |
| conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects | |
| of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All | |
| future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for | |
| v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/. | |
| CONTENTS | |
| 1. Introduction | |
| 1-1. Terminology | |
| 1-2. What is cgroup? | |
| 2. Basic Operations | |
| 2-1. Mounting | |
| 2-2. Organizing Processes | |
| 2-3. [Un]populated Notification | |
| 2-4. Controlling Controllers | |
| 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling | |
| 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint | |
| 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint | |
| 2-5. Delegation | |
| 2-5-1. Model of Delegation | |
| 2-5-2. Delegation Containment | |
| 2-6. Guidelines | |
| 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control | |
| 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions | |
| 3. Resource Distribution Models | |
| 3-1. Weights | |
| 3-2. Limits | |
| 3-3. Protections | |
| 3-4. Allocations | |
| 4. Interface Files | |
| 4-1. Format | |
| 4-2. Conventions | |
| 4-3. Core Interface Files | |
| 5. Controllers | |
| 5-1. CPU | |
| 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files | |
| 5-2. Memory | |
| 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files | |
| 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines | |
| 5-2-3. Memory Ownership | |
| 5-3. IO | |
| 5-3-1. IO Interface Files | |
| 5-3-2. Writeback | |
| 6. Namespace | |
| 6-1. Basics | |
| 6-2. The Root and Views | |
| 6-3. Migration and setns(2) | |
| 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces | |
| P. Information on Kernel Programming | |
| P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback | |
| D. Deprecated v1 Core Features | |
| R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2 | |
| R-1. Multiple Hierarchies | |
| R-2. Thread Granularity | |
| R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads | |
| R-4. Other Interface Issues | |
| R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies | |
| R-5-1. Memory | |
| 1. Introduction | |
| 1-1. Terminology | |
| "cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The | |
| singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a | |
| qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to | |
| multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used. | |
| 1-2. What is cgroup? | |
| cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and | |
| distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and | |
| configurable manner. | |
| cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers. | |
| cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing | |
| processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for | |
| distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy | |
| although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than | |
| resource distribution. | |
| cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs | |
| to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the | |
| same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that | |
| the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated | |
| to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already | |
| existing descendant processes. | |
| Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or | |
| disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are | |
| hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all | |
| processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive | |
| sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested | |
| cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The | |
| restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be | |
| overridden from further away. | |
| 2. Basic Operations | |
| 2-1. Mounting | |
| Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2 | |
| hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command. | |
| # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT | |
| cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All | |
| controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are | |
| automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root. | |
| Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be | |
| bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the | |
| legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way. | |
| A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller | |
| is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup | |
| controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may | |
| have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on | |
| the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy. | |
| Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of | |
| the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled | |
| controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due | |
| to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be | |
| disabled too. | |
| While useful for development and manual configurations, moving | |
| controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is | |
| strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide | |
| the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the | |
| controllers after system boot. | |
| During transition to v2, system management software might still | |
| automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers | |
| during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing | |
| and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows | |
| disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2. | |
| 2-2. Organizing Processes | |
| Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong. | |
| A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory. | |
| # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME | |
| A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree | |
| structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file | |
| "cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which | |
| belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the | |
| same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to | |
| another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading. | |
| A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the | |
| target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated | |
| on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple | |
| threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the | |
| process. | |
| When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the | |
| cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the | |
| operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup | |
| that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a | |
| zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be | |
| moved to another cgroup. | |
| A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be | |
| destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't | |
| have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is | |
| considered empty and can be removed. | |
| # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME | |
| "/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy | |
| cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines, | |
| one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the | |
| format "0::$PATH". | |
| # cat /proc/842/cgroup | |
| ... | |
| 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested | |
| If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with | |
| is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path. | |
| # cat /proc/842/cgroup | |
| ... | |
| 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted) | |
| 2-3. [Un]populated Notification | |
| Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains | |
| "populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has | |
| live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in | |
| the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify | |
| events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for | |
| example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given | |
| sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and | |
| notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy | |
| where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes | |
| in each cgroup. | |
| A(4) - B(0) - C(1) | |
| \ D(0) | |
| A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one | |
| process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and | |
| file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of | |
| both cgroups. | |
| 2-4. Controlling Controllers | |
| 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling | |
| Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all | |
| controllers available for the cgroup to enable. | |
| # cat cgroup.controllers | |
| cpu io memory | |
| No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and | |
| disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file. | |
| # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control | |
| Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be | |
| enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they | |
| all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller | |
| are specified, the last one is effective. | |
| Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of | |
| the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled. | |
| Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are | |
| listed in parentheses. | |
| A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C() | |
| \ D() | |
| As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution | |
| of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has | |
| "memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU | |
| cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled. | |
| As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to | |
| the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface | |
| files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B | |
| would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and | |
| D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory." | |
| prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the | |
| controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with | |
| "cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself. | |
| 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint | |
| Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute | |
| a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the | |
| parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files | |
| can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's | |
| "cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if | |
| the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be | |
| disabled if one or more children have it enabled. | |
| 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint | |
| Non-root cgroups can only distribute resources to their children when | |
| they don't have any processes of their own. In other words, only | |
| cgroups which don't contain any processes can have controllers enabled | |
| in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files. | |
| This guarantees that, when a controller is looking at the part of the | |
| hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on the | |
| leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete against | |
| internal processes of the parent. | |
| The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains | |
| processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated | |
| with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most | |
| controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed | |
| is up to each controller. | |
| Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no | |
| enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is | |
| important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a | |
| populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the | |
| cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the | |
| children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control" | |
| file. | |
| 2-5. Delegation | |
| 2-5-1. Model of Delegation | |
| A cgroup can be delegated to a less privileged user by granting write | |
| access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs" file to the user. Note | |
| that resource control interface files in a given directory control the | |
| distribution of the parent's resources and thus must not be delegated | |
| along with the directory. | |
| Once delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory, | |
| organize processes as it sees fit and further distribute the resources | |
| it received from the parent. The limits and other settings of all | |
| resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what happens | |
| in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the resource | |
| restrictions imposed by the parent. | |
| Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of | |
| cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however, | |
| this may be limited explicitly in the future. | |
| 2-5-2. Delegation Containment | |
| A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes | |
| can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee. For | |
| a process with a non-root euid to migrate a target process into a | |
| cgroup by writing its PID to the "cgroup.procs" file, the following | |
| conditions must be met. | |
| - The writer's euid must match either uid or suid of the target process. | |
| - The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file. | |
| - The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the | |
| common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups. | |
| The above three constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate | |
| processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull | |
| in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy. | |
| For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to | |
| user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and | |
| all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0. | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00 | |
| ~ cgroup ~ \ C01 | |
| ~ hierarchy ~ | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10 | |
| Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is | |
| currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the | |
| file and uid match on the process; however, the common ancestor of the | |
| source cgroup C10 and the destination cgroup C00 is above the points | |
| of delegation and U0 would not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" | |
| files and thus the write will be denied with -EACCES. | |
| 2-6. Guidelines | |
| 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control | |
| Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation | |
| and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the | |
| process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist | |
| inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms | |
| of synchronization cost. | |
| As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to | |
| apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload | |
| should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and | |
| resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource | |
| distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through | |
| the interface files. | |
| 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions | |
| Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same | |
| directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide | |
| with interface files. | |
| All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each | |
| controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and | |
| a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and | |
| '_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix | |
| character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't | |
| start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads | |
| such as job, service, slice, unit or workload. | |
| cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the | |
| user's responsibility to avoid them. | |
| 3. Resource Distribution Models | |
| cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes | |
| depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section | |
| describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors. | |
| 3-1. Weights | |
| A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all | |
| active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its | |
| weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the | |
| resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is | |
| work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually | |
| used for stateless resources. | |
| All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This | |
| allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine | |
| enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range. | |
| As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are | |
| valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or | |
| process migrations. | |
| "cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children | |
| and is an example of this type. | |
| 3-2. Limits | |
| A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource. | |
| Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can | |
| exceed the amount of resource available to the parent. | |
| Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop. | |
| As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are | |
| valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or | |
| process migrations. | |
| "io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume | |
| on an IO device and is an example of this type. | |
| 3-3. Protections | |
| A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of | |
| the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their | |
| protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort | |
| soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case | |
| only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among | |
| children. | |
| Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is | |
| noop. | |
| As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations | |
| are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or | |
| process migrations. | |
| "memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an | |
| example of this type. | |
| 3-4. Allocations | |
| A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite | |
| resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the | |
| allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource | |
| available to the parent. | |
| Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no | |
| resource. | |
| As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration | |
| combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the | |
| resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations | |
| may be rejected. | |
| "cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this | |
| type. | |
| 4. Interface Files | |
| 4-1. Format | |
| All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever | |
| possible. | |
| New-line separated values | |
| (when only one value can be written at once) | |
| VAL0\n | |
| VAL1\n | |
| ... | |
| Space separated values | |
| (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once) | |
| VAL0 VAL1 ...\n | |
| Flat keyed | |
| KEY0 VAL0\n | |
| KEY1 VAL1\n | |
| ... | |
| Nested keyed | |
| KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01... | |
| KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11... | |
| ... | |
| For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match | |
| reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or | |
| implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases. | |
| For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key | |
| can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs | |
| may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified. | |
| 4-2. Conventions | |
| - Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file. | |
| - The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus | |
| shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also, | |
| informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global | |
| information available elsewhere shouldn't exist. | |
| - If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its | |
| interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1, | |
| 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow | |
| enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it | |
| intuitive (the default is 100%). | |
| - If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or | |
| limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max" | |
| respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource | |
| guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low" | |
| and "high" respectively. | |
| In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be | |
| used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing. | |
| - If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific | |
| overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and | |
| appear as the first entry in the file. | |
| The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or | |
| "$VAL". | |
| When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as | |
| the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries | |
| with "default" as the value must not appear when read. | |
| For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers | |
| with integer values may look like the following. | |
| # cat cgroup-example-interface-file | |
| default 150 | |
| 8:0 300 | |
| The default value can be updated by | |
| # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file | |
| or | |
| # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file | |
| An override can be set by | |
| # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file | |
| and cleared by | |
| # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file | |
| # cat cgroup-example-interface-file | |
| default 125 | |
| 8:16 170 | |
| - For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file | |
| "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs. | |
| Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be | |
| generated on the file. | |
| 4-3. Core Interface Files | |
| All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup." | |
| cgroup.procs | |
| A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on | |
| all cgroups. | |
| When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to | |
| the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the | |
| same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved | |
| to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while | |
| reading. | |
| A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with | |
| the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the | |
| following conditions. | |
| - Its euid is either root or must match either uid or suid of | |
| the target process. | |
| - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file. | |
| - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the | |
| common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups. | |
| When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file | |
| should be granted along with the containing directory. | |
| cgroup.controllers | |
| A read-only space separated values file which exists on all | |
| cgroups. | |
| It shows space separated list of all controllers available to | |
| the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered. | |
| cgroup.subtree_control | |
| A read-write space separated values file which exists on all | |
| cgroups. Starts out empty. | |
| When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers | |
| which are enabled to control resource distribution from the | |
| cgroup to its children. | |
| Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-' | |
| can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller | |
| name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-' | |
| disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list, | |
| the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable | |
| operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail. | |
| cgroup.events | |
| A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. | |
| The following entries are defined. Unless specified | |
| otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file | |
| modified event. | |
| populated | |
| 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live | |
| processes; otherwise, 0. | |
| 5. Controllers | |
| 5-1. CPU | |
| [NOTE: The interface for the cpu controller hasn't been merged yet] | |
| The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This | |
| controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for | |
| normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for | |
| realtime scheduling policy. | |
| 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files | |
| All time durations are in microseconds. | |
| cpu.stat | |
| A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. | |
| It reports the following six stats. | |
| usage_usec | |
| user_usec | |
| system_usec | |
| nr_periods | |
| nr_throttled | |
| throttled_usec | |
| cpu.weight | |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. The default is "100". | |
| The weight in the range [1, 10000]. | |
| cpu.max | |
| A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups. | |
| The default is "max 100000". | |
| The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format. | |
| $MAX $PERIOD | |
| which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each | |
| $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only | |
| one number is written, $MAX is updated. | |
| cpu.rt.max | |
| [NOTE: The semantics of this file is still under discussion and the | |
| interface hasn't been merged yet] | |
| A read-write two value file which exists on all cgroups. | |
| The default is "0 100000". | |
| The maximum realtime runtime allocation. Over-committing | |
| configurations are disallowed and process migrations are | |
| rejected if not enough bandwidth is available. It's in the | |
| following format. | |
| $MAX $PERIOD | |
| which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each | |
| $PERIOD duration. If only one number is written, $MAX is | |
| updated. | |
| 5-2. Memory | |
| The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is | |
| stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the | |
| intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the | |
| stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively | |
| complex. | |
| While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given | |
| cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be | |
| accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the | |
| following types of memory usages are tracked. | |
| - Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory. | |
| - Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes. | |
| - TCP socket buffers. | |
| The above list may expand in the future for better coverage. | |
| 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files | |
| All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to | |
| PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest | |
| PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back. | |
| memory.current | |
| A read-only single value file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. | |
| The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup | |
| and its descendants. | |
| memory.low | |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. The default is "0". | |
| Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usages of a | |
| cgroup and all its ancestors are below their low boundaries, | |
| the cgroup's memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be | |
| reclaimed from unprotected cgroups. | |
| Putting more memory than generally available under this | |
| protection is discouraged. | |
| memory.high | |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. The default is "max". | |
| Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to | |
| control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes | |
| over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are | |
| throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure. | |
| Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and | |
| under extreme conditions the limit may be breached. | |
| memory.max | |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. The default is "max". | |
| Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection | |
| mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and | |
| can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup. | |
| Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit | |
| temporarily. | |
| This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the | |
| high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's | |
| utility is limited to providing the final safety net. | |
| memory.events | |
| A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. | |
| The following entries are defined. Unless specified | |
| otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file | |
| modified event. | |
| low | |
| The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to | |
| high memory pressure even though its usage is under | |
| the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low | |
| boundary is over-committed. | |
| high | |
| The number of times processes of the cgroup are | |
| throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim | |
| because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a | |
| cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit | |
| rather than global memory pressure, this event's | |
| occurrences are expected. | |
| max | |
| The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was | |
| about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim | |
| fails to bring it down, the OOM killer is invoked. | |
| oom | |
| The number of times the OOM killer has been invoked in | |
| the cgroup. This may not exactly match the number of | |
| processes killed but should generally be close. | |
| memory.stat | |
| A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. | |
| This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different | |
| types of memory, type-specific details, and other information | |
| on the state and past events of the memory management system. | |
| All memory amounts are in bytes. | |
| The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries | |
| can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a | |
| fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values! | |
| anon | |
| Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as | |
| brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS) | |
| file | |
| Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data, | |
| including tmpfs and shared memory. | |
| kernel_stack | |
| Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks. | |
| slab | |
| Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data | |
| structures. | |
| sock | |
| Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers | |
| file_mapped | |
| Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap() | |
| file_dirty | |
| Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but | |
| not yet written back to disk | |
| file_writeback | |
| Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and | |
| is currently being written back to disk | |
| inactive_anon | |
| active_anon | |
| inactive_file | |
| active_file | |
| unevictable | |
| Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed, | |
| on the internal memory management lists used by the | |
| page reclaim algorithm | |
| slab_reclaimable | |
| Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as | |
| dentries and inodes. | |
| slab_unreclaimable | |
| Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory | |
| pressure. | |
| pgfault | |
| Total number of page faults incurred | |
| pgmajfault | |
| Number of major page faults incurred | |
| memory.swap.current | |
| A read-only single value file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. | |
| The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup | |
| and its descendants. | |
| memory.swap.max | |
| A read-write single value file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. The default is "max". | |
| Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this | |
| limit, anonymous meomry of the cgroup will not be swapped out. | |
| 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines | |
| "memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage. | |
| Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory) | |
| and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to | |
| usage is a viable strategy. | |
| Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but | |
| throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample | |
| opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting | |
| more memory or terminating the workload. | |
| Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as | |
| memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from | |
| more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from | |
| network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as | |
| performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory | |
| pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of | |
| memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more | |
| memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't | |
| implemented yet. | |
| 5-2-3. Memory Ownership | |
| A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays | |
| charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process | |
| to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it | |
| instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup. | |
| A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups. | |
| To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however, | |
| over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has | |
| enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure. | |
| If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected | |
| to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use | |
| POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas | |
| belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership. | |
| 5-3. IO | |
| The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This | |
| controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS | |
| limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available | |
| only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for | |
| blk-mq devices. | |
| 5-3-1. IO Interface Files | |
| io.stat | |
| A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. | |
| Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. | |
| The following nested keys are defined. | |
| rbytes Bytes read | |
| wbytes Bytes written | |
| rios Number of read IOs | |
| wios Number of write IOs | |
| An example read output follows. | |
| 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353 | |
| 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252 | |
| io.weight | |
| A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups. | |
| The default is "default 100". | |
| The first line is the default weight applied to devices | |
| without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by | |
| $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in | |
| the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time | |
| the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings. | |
| The default weight can be updated by writing either "default | |
| $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing | |
| "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default". | |
| An example read output follows. | |
| default 100 | |
| 8:16 200 | |
| 8:0 50 | |
| io.max | |
| A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root | |
| cgroups. | |
| BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN | |
| device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are | |
| defined. | |
| rbps Max read bytes per second | |
| wbps Max write bytes per second | |
| riops Max read IO operations per second | |
| wiops Max write IO operations per second | |
| When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be | |
| specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value | |
| to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified | |
| multiple times, the outcome is undefined. | |
| BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are | |
| delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed. | |
| Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16. | |
| echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max | |
| Reading returns the following. | |
| 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120 | |
| Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following. | |
| echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max | |
| Reading now returns the following. | |
| 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max | |
| 5-3-2. Writeback | |
| Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and | |
| written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback | |
| mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and | |
| regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and | |
| write IOs. | |
| The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller, | |
| implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller | |
| defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and | |
| maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which | |
| writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and | |
| per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive | |
| of the two is enforced. | |
| cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying | |
| filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4 | |
| and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to | |
| the root cgroup. | |
| There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management | |
| which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per | |
| page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an | |
| inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages | |
| from the inode are attributed to that cgroup. | |
| As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages | |
| which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is | |
| associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback | |
| constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign | |
| cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches | |
| the ownership of the inode to that cgroup. | |
| While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is | |
| mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup | |
| changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single | |
| inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a | |
| significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly. | |
| As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and | |
| doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback | |
| strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping | |
| areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage | |
| patterns. | |
| The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup | |
| writeback as follows. | |
| vm.dirty_background_ratio | |
| vm.dirty_ratio | |
| These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the | |
| amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the | |
| memory controller and system-wide clean memory. | |
| vm.dirty_background_bytes | |
| vm.dirty_bytes | |
| For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against | |
| total available memory and applied the same way as | |
| vm.dirty[_background]_ratio. | |
| 6. Namespace | |
| 6-1. Basics | |
| cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the | |
| "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone | |
| flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup | |
| namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have | |
| its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The | |
| cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of | |
| the cgroup namespace. | |
| Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the | |
| complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where | |
| a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the | |
| "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information | |
| to the isolated processes. For Example: | |
| # cat /proc/self/cgroup | |
| 0::/batchjobs/container_id1 | |
| The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data | |
| and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace | |
| can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before | |
| creating a cgroup namespace, one would see: | |
| # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup | |
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835] | |
| # cat /proc/self/cgroup | |
| 0::/batchjobs/container_id1 | |
| After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes. | |
| # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup | |
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183] | |
| # cat /proc/self/cgroup | |
| 0::/ | |
| When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup | |
| namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all | |
| the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the | |
| legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected. | |
| A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or | |
| mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup | |
| namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups | |
| remain. | |
| 6-2. The Root and Views | |
| The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the | |
| process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in | |
| /batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup | |
| /batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the | |
| init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup. | |
| The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator | |
| process later moves to a different cgroup. | |
| # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup | |
| # cat /proc/self/cgroup | |
| 0::/ | |
| # mkdir sub_cgrp_1 | |
| # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs | |
| # cat /proc/self/cgroup | |
| 0::/sub_cgrp_1 | |
| Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup" | |
| Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see | |
| cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup. | |
| From within an unshared cgroupns: | |
| # sleep 100000 & | |
| [1] 7353 | |
| # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs | |
| # cat /proc/7353/cgroup | |
| 0::/sub_cgrp_1 | |
| From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be | |
| visible: | |
| $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup | |
| 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1 | |
| From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a | |
| different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup | |
| namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup | |
| namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see | |
| # cat /proc/7353/cgroup | |
| 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1 | |
| Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that | |
| its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller. | |
| 6-3. Migration and setns(2) | |
| Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the | |
| namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For | |
| example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at | |
| /batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is | |
| still accessible inside cgroupns: | |
| # cat /proc/7353/cgroup | |
| 0::/sub_cgrp_1 | |
| # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs | |
| # cat /proc/7353/cgroup | |
| 0::/../container_id2 | |
| Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup | |
| namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy. | |
| setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when: | |
| (a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace | |
| (b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup | |
| namespace's userns | |
| No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup | |
| namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching | |
| process under the target cgroup namespace root. | |
| 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces | |
| Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process | |
| running inside a non-init cgroup namespace. | |
| # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT | |
| This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the | |
| filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and | |
| mount namespaces. | |
| The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting | |
| the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount | |
| provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container. | |
| P. Information on Kernel Programming | |
| This section contains kernel programming information in the areas | |
| where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and | |
| controllers are not covered. | |
| P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback | |
| A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating | |
| address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the | |
| following two functions. | |
| wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio) | |
| Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and | |
| associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be | |
| called anytime between bio allocation and submission. | |
| wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes) | |
| Should be called for each data segment being written out. | |
| While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called | |
| during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most | |
| natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio. | |
| With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per | |
| super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for | |
| selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when | |
| certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are | |
| incompatible. | |
| wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on | |
| the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if | |
| the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal | |
| entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution | |
| for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem | |
| cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg() | |
| directly. | |
| D. Deprecated v1 Core Features | |
| - Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported. | |
| - All mount options and remounting are not supported. | |
| - The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted. | |
| - "cgroup.clone_children" is removed. | |
| - /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file | |
| at the root instead. | |
| R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2 | |
| R-1. Multiple Hierarchies | |
| cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each | |
| hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to | |
| provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice. | |
| For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility | |
| type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all | |
| hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by | |
| the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once | |
| hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers | |
| bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the | |
| hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on | |
| the specific controller. | |
| In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be | |
| put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting | |
| each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such | |
| as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same | |
| hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple | |
| similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy | |
| whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary. | |
| Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost. | |
| It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly | |
| the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be | |
| used in general and what controllers was able to do. | |
| There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant | |
| that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite | |
| length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited | |
| in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to | |
| addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership, | |
| which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number | |
| of hierarchies. | |
| Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the | |
| topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each | |
| controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to | |
| completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at | |
| least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other. | |
| In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are | |
| completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is | |
| called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity | |
| depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may | |
| be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific | |
| controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about | |
| how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting | |
| to control how CPU cycles are distributed. | |
| R-2. Thread Granularity | |
| cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups. | |
| This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers | |
| ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but | |
| much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to | |
| individual applications and system management interface. | |
| Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process | |
| itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes, | |
| categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from | |
| the application which owns the target process. | |
| cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused | |
| in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to | |
| individual applications so that they can create and manage their own | |
| sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This | |
| effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed | |
| to lay programs. | |
| First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be | |
| exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to | |
| extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup, | |
| construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open | |
| and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky | |
| and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to | |
| define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee | |
| that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy. | |
| cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be | |
| accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to | |
| system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface | |
| knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly | |
| revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to | |
| individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism | |
| effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs | |
| without going through the required scrutiny. | |
| This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with | |
| misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and | |
| locked into constructs inadvertently. | |
| R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads | |
| cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an | |
| interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its | |
| children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two | |
| different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to | |
| settle it. Different controllers did different things. | |
| The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and | |
| mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but | |
| fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU | |
| cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios | |
| constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated. | |
| There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight | |
| wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which | |
| simply weren't available for threads. | |
| The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each | |
| cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all | |
| the knobs with "leaf_" prefixed. While this allowed equivalent | |
| control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It | |
| always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary | |
| otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the | |
| implementation. | |
| The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened | |
| between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not | |
| clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and | |
| knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have | |
| led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term. | |
| Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with | |
| different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were | |
| severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors | |
| made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent. | |
| This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core | |
| in a uniform way. | |
| R-4. Other Interface Issues | |
| cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of | |
| idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side | |
| was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was | |
| forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't | |
| recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led | |
| to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating | |
| the interface. | |
| Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is | |
| controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating | |
| all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root | |
| cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent | |
| implementation details to userland. | |
| There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup | |
| was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra | |
| restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until | |
| explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of | |
| control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics | |
| and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different | |
| formats and units even in the same controller. | |
| cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates | |
| controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces. | |
| R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies | |
| R-5-1. Memory | |
| The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit | |
| that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that | |
| global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for | |
| optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the | |
| implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the | |
| basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no | |
| hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global | |
| rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located | |
| in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second, | |
| the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just | |
| introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts | |
| system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature | |
| becomes self-defeating. | |
| The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated | |
| reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its | |
| ancestors are below their low boundaries, which makes delegation of | |
| subtrees possible. Secondly, new cgroups have no reserve per default | |
| and in the common case most cgroups are eligible for the preferred | |
| reclaim pass. This allows the new low boundary to be efficiently | |
| implemented with just a minor addition to the generic reclaim code, | |
| without the need for out-of-band data structures and reclaim passes. | |
| Because the generic reclaim code considers all cgroups except for the | |
| ones running low in the preferred first reclaim pass, overreclaim of | |
| individual groups is eliminated as well, resulting in much better | |
| overall workload performance. | |
| The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict | |
| limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called. | |
| But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the | |
| available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during | |
| runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a | |
| strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the | |
| working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size | |
| estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in | |
| OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and | |
| end up wasting precious resources. | |
| The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more | |
| conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them | |
| into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the | |
| OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too | |
| aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will | |
| lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this | |
| and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still | |
| gives acceptable performance is found. | |
| In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete | |
| breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can | |
| be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the | |
| allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the | |
| system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to | |
| limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even | |
| malicious applications. | |
| Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was | |
| subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the | |
| limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the | |
| limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the | |
| new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed. | |
| The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real | |
| control over swap space. | |
| The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original | |
| cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be | |
| able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the | |
| child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted | |
| groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its | |
| anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full | |
| swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs. | |
| For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an | |
| intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea | |
| that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical | |
| resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system, | |
| and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately. |