| RT-mutex subsystem with PI support | |
| ---------------------------------- | |
| RT-mutexes with priority inheritance are used to support PI-futexes, | |
| which enable pthread_mutex_t priority inheritance attributes | |
| (PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT). [See Documentation/pi-futex.txt for more details | |
| about PI-futexes.] | |
| This technology was developed in the -rt tree and streamlined for | |
| pthread_mutex support. | |
| Basic principles: | |
| ----------------- | |
| RT-mutexes extend the semantics of simple mutexes by the priority | |
| inheritance protocol. | |
| A low priority owner of a rt-mutex inherits the priority of a higher | |
| priority waiter until the rt-mutex is released. If the temporarily | |
| boosted owner blocks on a rt-mutex itself it propagates the priority | |
| boosting to the owner of the other rt_mutex it gets blocked on. The | |
| priority boosting is immediately removed once the rt_mutex has been | |
| unlocked. | |
| This approach allows us to shorten the block of high-prio tasks on | |
| mutexes which protect shared resources. Priority inheritance is not a | |
| magic bullet for poorly designed applications, but it allows | |
| well-designed applications to use userspace locks in critical parts of | |
| an high priority thread, without losing determinism. | |
| The enqueueing of the waiters into the rtmutex waiter list is done in | |
| priority order. For same priorities FIFO order is chosen. For each | |
| rtmutex, only the top priority waiter is enqueued into the owner's | |
| priority waiters list. This list too queues in priority order. Whenever | |
| the top priority waiter of a task changes (for example it timed out or | |
| got a signal), the priority of the owner task is readjusted. [The | |
| priority enqueueing is handled by "plists", see include/linux/plist.h | |
| for more details.] | |
| RT-mutexes are optimized for fastpath operations and have no internal | |
| locking overhead when locking an uncontended mutex or unlocking a mutex | |
| without waiters. The optimized fastpath operations require cmpxchg | |
| support. [If that is not available then the rt-mutex internal spinlock | |
| is used] | |
| The state of the rt-mutex is tracked via the owner field of the rt-mutex | |
| structure: | |
| rt_mutex->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 and 1 | |
| are used to keep track of the "owner is pending" and "rtmutex has | |
| waiters" state. | |
| owner bit1 bit0 | |
| NULL 0 0 mutex is free (fast acquire possible) | |
| NULL 0 1 invalid state | |
| NULL 1 0 Transitional state* | |
| NULL 1 1 invalid state | |
| taskpointer 0 0 mutex is held (fast release possible) | |
| taskpointer 0 1 task is pending owner | |
| taskpointer 1 0 mutex is held and has waiters | |
| taskpointer 1 1 task is pending owner and mutex has waiters | |
| Pending-ownership handling is a performance optimization: | |
| pending-ownership is assigned to the first (highest priority) waiter of | |
| the mutex, when the mutex is released. The thread is woken up and once | |
| it starts executing it can acquire the mutex. Until the mutex is taken | |
| by it (bit 0 is cleared) a competing higher priority thread can "steal" | |
| the mutex which puts the woken up thread back on the waiters list. | |
| The pending-ownership optimization is especially important for the | |
| uninterrupted workflow of high-prio tasks which repeatedly | |
| takes/releases locks that have lower-prio waiters. Without this | |
| optimization the higher-prio thread would ping-pong to the lower-prio | |
| task [because at unlock time we always assign a new owner]. | |
| (*) The "mutex has waiters" bit gets set to take the lock. If the lock | |
| doesn't already have an owner, this bit is quickly cleared if there are | |
| no waiters. So this is a transitional state to synchronize with looking | |
| at the owner field of the mutex and the mutex owner releasing the lock. |