| CPU Scheduler implementation hints for architecture specific code | |
| Nick Piggin, 2005 | |
| Context switch | |
| ============== | |
| 1. Runqueue locking | |
| By default, the switch_to arch function is called with the runqueue | |
| locked. This is usually not a problem unless switch_to may need to | |
| take the runqueue lock. This is usually due to a wake up operation in | |
| the context switch. See arch/ia64/include/asm/switch_to.h for an example. | |
| To request the scheduler call switch_to with the runqueue unlocked, | |
| you must `#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW` in a header file | |
| (typically the one where switch_to is defined). | |
| Unlocked context switches introduce only a very minor performance | |
| penalty to the core scheduler implementation in the CONFIG_SMP case. | |
| CPU idle | |
| ======== | |
| Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules: | |
| 1. Preempt should now disabled over idle routines. Should only | |
| be enabled to call schedule() then disabled again. | |
| 2. need_resched/TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only ever set, and will never | |
| be cleared until the running task has called schedule(). Idle | |
| threads need only ever query need_resched, and may never set or | |
| clear it. | |
| 3. When cpu_idle finds (need_resched() == 'true'), it should call | |
| schedule(). It should not call schedule() otherwise. | |
| 4. The only time interrupts need to be disabled when checking | |
| need_resched is if we are about to sleep the processor until | |
| the next interrupt (this doesn't provide any protection of | |
| need_resched, it prevents losing an interrupt). | |
| 4a. Common problem with this type of sleep appears to be: | |
| local_irq_disable(); | |
| if (!need_resched()) { | |
| local_irq_enable(); | |
| *** resched interrupt arrives here *** | |
| __asm__("sleep until next interrupt"); | |
| } | |
| 5. TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can be set by idle routines that do not | |
| need an interrupt to wake them up when need_resched goes high. | |
| In other words, they must be periodically polling need_resched, | |
| although it may be reasonable to do some background work or enter | |
| a low CPU priority. | |
| 5a. If TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is set, and we do decide to enter | |
| an interrupt sleep, it needs to be cleared then a memory | |
| barrier issued (followed by a test of need_resched with | |
| interrupts disabled, as explained in 3). | |
| arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and | |
| sleeping idle functions. | |
| Possible arch/ problems | |
| ======================= | |
| Possible arch problems I found (and either tried to fix or didn't): | |
| ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a) | |
| sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a) | |
| sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable. | |
| - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1) | |