arch-arm: Fix Virtual interrupts in AArch64

Checking if cpsr.mode is equal to MODE_HYP doesn't work for AArch64.
This is because AArch64 is using different modes when in EL2, like EL2T
and EL2H.
This made Virtual Interrupts to be triggered even when executing in EL2
(hypervisor) whereas they should interrupt the scheduled VM only
(Non-Secure EL0 and EL1). This patch is fixing this by using the generic
currEL() helper for getting the exception level, which is working for
both AArch32 and AArch64.

Change-Id: I08640050ef06261f280ba1e63ca9f32c805af845
Signed-off-by: Giacomo Travaglini <giacomo.travaglini@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/16202
Maintainer: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
diff --git a/src/arch/arm/interrupts.hh b/src/arch/arm/interrupts.hh
index 77287e6..8d0cb49 100644
--- a/src/arch/arm/interrupts.hh
+++ b/src/arch/arm/interrupts.hh
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
 
         CPSR cpsr = tc->readMiscReg(MISCREG_CPSR);
 
-        bool isHypMode   = cpsr.mode == MODE_HYP;
+        bool isHypMode   = currEL(tc) == EL2;
         bool isSecure    = inSecureState(tc);
         bool allowVIrq   = !cpsr.i && hcr.imo && !isSecure && !isHypMode;
         bool allowVFiq   = !cpsr.f && hcr.fmo && !isSecure && !isHypMode;
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@
         // Calculate a few temp vars so we can work out if there's a pending
         // virtual interrupt, and if its allowed to happen
         // ARM ARM Issue C section B1.9.9, B1.9.11, and B1.9.13
-        bool isHypMode   = cpsr.mode == MODE_HYP;
+        bool isHypMode   = currEL(tc) == EL2;
         bool isSecure    = inSecureState(tc);
         bool allowVIrq   = !cpsr.i && hcr.imo && !isSecure && !isHypMode;
         bool allowVFiq   = !cpsr.f && hcr.fmo && !isSecure && !isHypMode;