blob: 4312ed6f37d5a6eb7c9de92c52cc265371f90845 [file] [log] [blame]
* Routines for selecting the k largest or smallest values could use
heapsort for speed O(N log k) rather than insertion O(N k).
* Sorting of complex arrarys without using additional memory. We try
to avoid allocating memory internally in GSL, so internally computing
the magnitudes and storing them in a temporary array is undesirable.
Obviously a complex array can be sorted using sqrt(x*x + y*y) <=>
sqrt(u*u + v*v) (written in a numerically stable way) for every
comparison, but this may be unacceptably slow. Maybe not? It is just a
constant factor. The square roots could sometimes be avoided by
optimization,
(x,y) = (MAX(|x|,|y|), MIN(|x|,|y|))
(u,v) = (MAX(|u|,|v|), MIN(|u|,|v|))
if (x < u/sqrt(2)) /* This part is optional optimization */
return -1
if (x > u*sqrt(2))
return +1
if (x == 0 && u == 0) ...
if (x == 0) ...
if (u == 0) ...
t = u*sqrt((1+(v/u)^2)/(1+(y/x)^2))
if (x < t)
return -1
if (x > t)
return +1
else
return 0
but this does depend on the data having sufficient range for the
optimization to be worthwhile, otherwise it is an extra cost.