blob: f6ec8e8831d8864fbbbd9b38f2e3bbcc9af2398c [file] [log] [blame]
solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5
For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'
gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.
I belive the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler
is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'. For 'speed', the DES
routines are being linked from a library. I'll record the higher
speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline
'des_enc.c'.
[ 16-Jan-06 - I've been playing with the
'-xtarget=ultra -xarch=v8plus -Xa -xO5 -Xa'
and while it makes the des_opts numbers much slower, it makes the
actual 'speed' numbers look better which is a realistic version of
using the libraries. ]
options des ecb/s
16 r1 p 475516.90 100.0%
16 r2 p 439388.10 92.4%
16 c i 427001.40 89.8%
16 c p 419516.50 88.2%
4 r2 p 409491.70 86.1%
4 r1 p 404266.90 85.0%
4 c p 398121.00 83.7%
4 c i 370588.40 77.9%
4 r1 i 362742.20 76.3%
16 r2 i 331275.50 69.7%
16 r1 i 324730.60 68.3%
4 r2 i 63535.10 13.4% <-- very very weird, must be cache problems.
-DDES_UNROLL -DDES_RISC1 -DDES_PTR